The answer is: Archelaus

Matthew 2:22 - son of Herod the Great.

After King Herod the Great passed on, his realm was split among his sons, speaking to the theme of family dynamics even in royal lineage! Archelaus became the ruler of Judea, Samaria, and Idumea, assuming a challenging role in a territory fraught with political tension and public discontent. His rule was marked by a controversial mark—not only was he seen as a heavy-handed leader, but historical records also show that he faced difficulties in gaining the trust of the people, often implementing measures that displeased them.

Interesting tidbit: out of all of Herod’s sons, Archelaus was by far the least popular. His brutal approach reportedly led to more strife than stability, and just a few years later, Emperor Augustus decided to remove him from power—shifting governance to a Roman prefect. This incident is fascinating because it highlights the profound impact of leadership styles and politics on the lives of common people during this era.

Moreover, even though Archelaus is not often talked about directly in the Biblical narrative, his unflattering portrayal paints a broader picture of a kingdom divided—not just personally but also in faith, as the arrival of Jesus was unfolding. Matthew skillfully weaves a narrative that juxtaposes the royal birthright against a backdrop of political complexity, signaling a turning point in societal and spiritual governance. It’s almost like living terrain for the message that would emerge—not of kingship, but of a new covenant for all humanity.